Breast Implants Research - Silicone Implant, Breast Augmentation, Surgery, Risks

Breast Implants Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Breast Implants, including details on silicone implant, breast augmentation, surgery, risks.


Breast Implants Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Breast Implants

Books on Breast Implants

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Inamed silicone breast implant core study results at 6 years.

Spear SL, Murphy DK, Slicton A, Walker PS,

Department of Plastic Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007-2113, USA. spears@gunet.georgetown.edu

BACKGROUND: Silicone gel-filled breast implants were developed in 1962 but did not fall under the auspices of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration until 1976 and were not classified as class III devices until 1988. This set the stage for a series of Food and Drug Administration advisory panel meetings and a moratorium on the sale of these implants from 1992 until 2006, when sufficient clinical data were presented to demonstrate their safety. METHODS: This study was conducted under the rigorous framework of a Food and Drug Administration-approved investigational device exemption to document the safety and effectiveness of Inamed silicone-filled breast implants through 10 years. Of 940 female subjects, approximately half were augmentation subjects, one-quarter were reconstruction subjects, and one-quarter were revision subjects. Follow-up visits were conducted at 0 to 4 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and annually thereafter. Approximately one-third of subjects also underwent biennial magnetic resonance imaging evaluation to detect silent rupture. Primary statistical analyses used the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. RESULTS: Data through 6 years are currently available from the 10-year study, with patient follow-up rates for that visit ranging from 78 to 92 percent per cohort. As expected, the most common local complication in all cohorts was capsular contracture, occurring in 15 to 20 percent of subjects. The by-implant rupture rate was 3.5 percent overall at 6 years. Satisfaction with implants was uniformly high throughout the study period, with 6-year rates of 95 percent for augmentation subjects and 94 percent for reconstruction subjects. CONCLUSION: Study results demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of Inamed silicone-filled breast implants through 6 years, including a low rupture rate and high satisfaction rate.

Published 19 December 2007 in Plast Reconstr Surg, 120(7): 8S-16S; discussion 17S-18S.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2005-2008 Breast Implants Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Breast Implants Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2005)
  Issue 1 (March)
  Issue 2 (April)
  Issue 3 (May)
  Issue 4 (June)
  Issue 5 (July)
  Issue 6 (August)
  Issue 7 (September)
  Issue 8 (October)
  Issue 9 (November)
  Issue 10 (December)

Volume 2 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)



Breast Implants Books

The Truth About Breast Implants

The Truth About Breast Implants